Forbes repsonds to criticism of its “innovative leaders” list, which is 99% male
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be4a2/be4a2e0641939e7fd98dd97e058cb0ae9da6f567" alt=""
File photo courtesy: Unsplash.
Forbes’ “Most Innovative Leaders” list was a trending topic on social media Saturday and Sunday, with several widely-circulated posts questioning why the feature, which apparently profiles “the most creative and successful business minds [in the U.S.] today” only includes one woman, Ross Stores CEO Barbara Rentler.
To make the optics even worse, Rentler was placed in the 75th spot out of 100 and her photo was not featured, replaced instead with a greyed-out, male sillouhette.
Not even a *photo* of Barbara Rentler, the only woman on Forbes’ list of (100+) America’s Most Innovative Leaders. Just a silhouette of some dude. pic.twitter.com/ceUaxx3uCG
— Eric Oesterle (@erico) September 6, 2019
Securing Rentler’s photograph wouldn’t have been an arduous task for a well-connected organization like Forbes, a fact that was made even clearer by several publications using her image alongside their coverage of the Forbes list.
Barbara Rentler, CEO of Ross Stores, is the only woman on Forbes US 100 Most Innovative Leaders listhttps://t.co/rhKcjKk2oe
— India Today (@IndiaToday) September 8, 2019
Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, and Mark Zuckerberg (and their accompanying photographs) make up the top three.
Forbes commissioned two business school professors and a consultant, all male, to assemble the list which is based on four merits:
Twitter users were quick to point out the lack of gender diversity — not only on the list itself, but also in the editorial process.
That Forbes list of 100 innovators that only has one woman doesn't just say something about Forbes and their shoddy reporting, it says something about society that doesn't make women innovators prominent enough that Forbes would find them an obvious choice for the list.
— Erin Biba (@erinbiba) September 8, 2019
What an interesting failure. Not a single woman in .@Forbes 100 most Innovative Leaders. Turns out the people making the selection weren’t particularly diverse either. This is why diversity of thought matters. #womenintech #mindfulleadership #inclusive https://t.co/5razVTNTj5
— Noelle 🤟🏼 (@NoelleSilver_) September 6, 2019
I mean… if Forbes sets out to create a list of the top 100 innovators and only one woman makes the cut THAT’s the headline. THAT’s the article to write, and not as a deep dive afterthought.
— Karyn Kobayashi (@karynkobayashi) September 8, 2019
Gender parity is way more compelling subject matter than 99 headshots of dudes.
On Sunday, Forbes responded to the criticism, admitting the predominantly-male profile was an “opportunity missed.”
In a Sunday op-ed, Forbes chief content officer Randall Lane says the methodology was similar to the process Forbes uses to populate its “Most Innovative Companies” list.
“This pool ultimately proved the problem,” he writes.
“Women, as we all know, are poorly represented at the top of the largest corporations (just 5% of the S&P 500) and fare even worse among growing public tech companies. In other words, for all our carefully-calibrated methodology, women never had much of a chance here.”
In retrospect, Lane says Forbes should have used the opportunity to analyze the larger, societal barriers and unconscious (and conscious) bais that prevents women from ascending into the highest levels of management.
“Forbes’ brand stems from inclusive, entrepreneurial capitalism – the idea that free markets, open to all, have proven the best-ever system to produce wealth and happiness and solve societal problems,” Lane writes, adding the publication will now have to “rethink” its processes surrounding its “Most Innovative Leaders” list.